Somatic Experiencing (SE) is not simply about bringing up feelings, but rather aims to carefully process trauma through bodily sensations in a controlled manner. However, there are some valid criticisms and limitations of SE that are worth considering:

Lack of robust scientific evidence: While some preliminary studies show promise, there is currently insufficient high-quality research to conclusively prove SE’s effectiveness.
Risk of retraumatization: Simply bringing up traumatic feelings without proper processing can potentially retraumatize someone.
Overemphasis on bodily sensations: SE’s focus on physical sensations does not adequately address the cognitive and emotional aspects of trauma processing that other therapies target.
Lack of standardization: SE can be practiced by people without formal psychotherapy training, which may lead to inconsistent application of techniques.
Incomplete processing: While SE aims to release “trapped” energy from trauma, it does not provide the comprehensive cognitive restructuring and narrative processing that trauma survivors need.
Touch-based interventions: The use of touch in SE could be triggering or inappropriate for some trauma survivor.
Theoretical foundations: Some of the theories underlying SE, like polyvagal theory, are not yet fully scientifically validated.
Does not address complex trauma: SE is insufficient for addressing complex, long-standing trauma that requires more in-depth psychological work.

A more comprehensive approach that integrates cognitive processing, emotional regulation, and body-based interventions may be necessary for full recovery. Evidence-based trauma therapies like EMDR and Brainspotting have stronger scientific support and may be more appropriate first-line treatments for many trauma survivors.

Resources : https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/somatic-experiencing